Clyde & Co Launches APAC Cyber Risk Advisory Practice

Clyde & Co Branch Out With Cyber Risk Advisory Practice

Earlier this month, global law firm Clyde & Co launched its newly established APAC Cyber Risk Advisory practice, in a move that further strengthens the firm’s cyber incident response and digital law team in Australia. The new offering is to address the rapidly increasing client demand resulting from heightened pressure on organisations to continually improve their cybersecurity position.

Recognising the growing demand for cyber, privacy and digital advice, Chris McLaughlin, a leading cyber risk advisor and his team will work with clients to bolster their cyber resilience to minimise the potential of incidents occurring and reduce the possibilities of financial, operational and reputational damages occurring.

Clyde & Co’s cyber practice provides an end-to-end cyber risk solution to clients covering transactions, innovations, pre-incident readiness and incident response through to regulatory investigations, proceedings, third party claims (including group litigation) and recoveries. 

John Moran, Partner, Co-Head Global Cyber Practice, Sydney, says, “Organisations across Australia and New Zealand are facing ever-rising expectations when it comes to being ready for, responding to and recovering from cyber incidents."

Chris comments, “As the cyber risk landscape continues to evolve, it’s more important than ever for organisations to be targeted in their approach to uplifting their security. I’m looking forward to working with our clients to help them prioritise security-enhancing activities that are pragmatic and help them get the most out of their security investment.”

The Australian cyber team has previously advised on more than 2,000 cyber incidents and data breaches, ranging from small incidents to some of the largest, most high profile, and multi-jurisdictional incidents to date.

Source: Clyde & Co

Subscribe to the Legal Practice Intelligence fortnightly eBulletin.   

Disclaimer: The views and opinions expressed in this article do not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of Novum Learning or Legal Practice Intelligence (LPI). While every attempt has been made to ensure that the information in this article has been obtained from reliable sources, neither Novum Learning or LPI nor the author is responsible for any errors or omissions, or for the results obtained from the use of this information, as the content published here is for information purposes only. The article does not constitute a comprehensive or complete statement of the matters discussed or the law relating thereto and does not constitute professional and/or financial advice.

Subscribe to the Legal Practice Intelligence fortnightly eBulletin.   

Disclaimer: The views and opinions expressed in this article do not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of Novum Learning or Legal Practice Intelligence (LPI). While every attempt has been made to ensure that the information in this article has been obtained from reliable sources, neither Novum Learning or LPI nor the author is responsible for any errors or omissions, or for the results obtained from the use of this information, as the content published here is for information purposes only. The article does not constitute a comprehensive or complete statement of the matters discussed or the law relating thereto and does not constitute professional and/or financial advice.

Back to blog