Law Firm File Management

Law Firm Best Practices for Archival Preservation

Preserving historical information has taken on new dimensions in an era of rapid technological advancements. “Two ever-present elements in any legal practice are documents and time constraints,” says Lawyers Mutual. Implementing a comprehensive firm-wide policy for file management and retention saves time and money and diminishes the potential for malpractice claims. As we transition from physical archives to digital repositories, robust information security measures become paramount. This article outlines best practices for the secure archival of historical information, ensuring its integrity, accessibility, and longevity.

Traditional physical archives, meticulously organised and catalogued, are evolving in the face of the digital revolution. This section explores how vast amounts of historical material, from manuscripts to photographs, are now digitised and stored electronically. While enhancing accessibility and dissemination, this transition introduces new challenges, especially in the realm of information security.

Challenges in Information Security for Historical Archives:

  1. Data Integrity: Ensuring the accuracy and reliability of historical information is crucial, with data corruption posing a significant threat.
  2. Cybersecurity Threats: Historical archives are tempting targets for cybercriminals. Measures such as firewalls and security audits are imperative to guard against unauthorised access and data breaches.
  3. Preservation of Authenticity: Maintaining the authenticity of historical documents is paramount, necessitating protocols to prevent unauthorised alterations or forgeries.
  4. Long-Term Storage Concerns: Historical archives must withstand the test of time, requiring security measures to address challenges in long-term digital storage.

Strategies for Securing Historical Archives:

  1. Data Integrity Checks: Rigorous checks to verify the accuracy and consistency of historical information.
  2. Access Control: Implementing strict access controls to safeguard historical archives, with a tiered access system based on roles and responsibilities.
  3. Encryption: Utilising strong encryption for data at rest and in transit to add a layer of protection.
  4. Regular Backups: Ensuring data recovery in the event of a security breach, with offsite storage to protect against physical disasters.
  5. Digital Preservation Standards: Adhering to digital preservation standards for longevity includes choosing open and standardised formats, regularly migrating to newer technologies, and staying informed about evolving best practices.
  6. Education and Training: Regular training sessions foster a culture of security awareness among personnel involved in archival processes.
  7. Secure Physical Storage: Ensuring secure storage facilities for physically stored historical matter, protecting against theft, fire, and environmental factors.
  8. Collaboration with Security Experts: Engaging with information security experts to evaluate and enhance the security posture of historical archives.
  9. Legal and Ethical Compliance: Staying compliant with relevant legal and ethical standards governing the preservation of historical information to avoid legal complications.

Australian Legal Sector 

From our initial analysis of the Australian legal sector, we see smart law firms across all tiers meeting the challenge head-on and implementing technologies like File Republic or FileTrail to mitigate risk, satisfy client demands and inject productivity and cost savings into their firms. We will invite both companies to submit their key market findings and propositions in the near future.

Also read: Top 10 AU Law Firm Selects FileTrail with NetDocuments

Subscribe to the Legal Practice Intelligence fortnightly eBulletin. Follow the links to access more articles related to the business of law and legal technology.    

Disclaimer:  The views and opinions expressed in this article do not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of Novum Learning or Legal Practice Intelligence (LPI). While every attempt has been made to ensure that the information in this article has been obtained from reliable sources, neither Novum Learning or LPI nor the author is responsible for any errors or omissions, or for the results obtained from the use of this information, as the content published here is for information purposes only. The article does not constitute a comprehensive or complete statement of the matters discussed or the law relating thereto and does not constitute professional and/or financial advice.

Back to blog