Law Firm Immigration Work to Pick Up
The Law Council welcomes the Australian Government’s investment of $58m in the Administrative Appeals Tribunal (AAT) and the Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (FCFCOA) to increase the capacity of those bodies to deal with significant Protection visa and other migration-related caseloads.
“We have been concerned about the impact of visa processing backlogs and backlogs at the merits and judicial review stages. These delays impede the expeditious entry of migrants into Australia, are a disincentive to skilled migrants, and can leave migrants awaiting resolution of their matters vulnerable to poverty and exploitation,” Law Council of Australia President, Mr Luke Murphy said.
“The AAT has an active migration caseload of more than 50,000 matters, and at the end of the last financial year, the FCFCOA’s pending migration caseload was larger than its pending final order family law caseload for the first time.
“The Law Council has argued that in order to address this backlog, a whole-of-system approach is required.
“Investment in the AAT, without investment in the FCFCOA, would be ineffective because an increase in AAT finalisations will result in an increase in appeals to the FCFCOA. We commend the Government on providing additional funding to both bodies.”
The funding announced yesterday provides for an additional 10 Members for the AAT – above the 93 new Members already announced – and an additional 10 FCFCOA judges.
“Equally, measures to reduce these backlogs will increase the need for legal assistance services,” Mr Murphy said. “People navigating the merits and judicial review system must be able to access advice and support.
“Therefore, we were pleased by the decision to direct $48m towards boosting essential legal assistance services to support applicants through the application and review processes.”
Read other Practice relative news.
Subscribe to the Legal Practice Intelligence fortnightly eBulletin. Follow the links to access more articles related to the business of law and legal technology.
Disclaimer: The views and opinions expressed in this article do not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of Novum Learning or Legal Practice Intelligence (LPI). While every attempt has been made to ensure that the information in this article has been obtained from reliable sources, neither Novum Learning or LPI nor the author is responsible for any errors or omissions, or for the results obtained from the use of this information, as the content published here is for information purposes only. The article does not constitute a comprehensive or complete statement of the matters discussed or the law relating thereto and does not constitute professional and/or financial advice.
